Objectivism Online Forum: Sexual Etymology: Fellatio and Cunnilingus - Objectivism Online Forum

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Sexual Etymology: Fellatio and Cunnilingus Rate Topic: -----

#1 User is offline   Jason Stotts 

  • Junior Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Regulars
  • Posts: 33
  • Joined: 16-December 09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Greater Los Angeles Area
  • Chat Nick:Jason
  • Real Name:Jason Stotts

Posted 24 December 2009 - 11:31 AM

By noreply@blogger.com (Jason) from Erosophia,cross-posted by MetaBlog

by Jason

[Today's words are from Etymonline.com and not Chambers, since Chambers didn't have these words listed]

Today's words are the technical names for "blow job" (fellatio) and "eating out" (cunnilingus).

Fellatio: 1887, from Latin fellatus, pp. of fellare "to suck," from PIE base *dhe- (see fecund). The sexual partner performing fellatio is a fellator; if female, a fellatrice or fellatrix.

Cunnilingus: 1887, from modern Latin cunnus "vulva" (see cunt) + lingere "to lick" . The Latin properly would mean "one who licks a vulva," but it is used in English in reference to the action, not the actor. The verb ought to be cunnilingue.

One thing I find interesting about the words we use for oral sex is that both of our current terms (blowjob and eat out) are very metaphorical in nature and very imprecise, whereas the latin is very literal and direct.  Compare the term "blow job" (who wants someone just to blow on their penis?) with fellatio, which is literally to suck (which is what one is actually desiring).  Or the term "eating out" (which is so purposefully ambiguous to be nonsensical) with cunnilingus, which is literally to lick the vulva (which is what one actually desires - or at least to lick the clit, but that the clit was distinct from the vulva may not have been entirely understood at the time).

I think these two Latin words are much better than the current words we employ and I try to use them in my writing, instead of the more confused words that are currently in vogue.  Although, I'm not suggesting that you start using Latin in bed, but consider asking for an action directly (suck my penis) as opposed to asking for something that you don't actually want (blow on my penis).

I'm still taking suggestions for next week's edition of Sexual Etymology, on the list still are:

-hymen
-orgasm
-coitus
-fetish
-paraphilia
-homosexuality
-heterosexuality
-sodomy
-erotic
-procreation
-hysteriahttp://feeds.feedbur.../~4/HyKcpsNoMPM

View the full article
~Jason
0

#2 User is offline   Iudicious 

  • Junior Member
  • PipPip
  • Group: Regulars
  • Posts: 90
  • Joined: 05-June 09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St. Petersburg, Florida
  • Chat Nick:Iudicious
  • Real Name:Sean Carter

Posted 24 December 2009 - 03:46 PM

Is there something wrong with speaking Latin in bed? :huh:
"His course was set some millions of years in advance when first man, that wondrous two legged creature, emerged from the seas and took his first steps upon the untouched shores of our beginnings. From that moment, it was not man that dictated the future, but the very Earth itself which said that this moment would come, that some day, somehow, the spellbound gaze of the first cosmic explorer would set itself upon the stars in the sky and proclaim that THIS was its future, that THIS day, THIS moment, THIS instant, was what it had lived for. It was not by some random chance that we arrived at this moment: it was by virtue of man's unconquerable capacity for thought, his undefeatable will to live, and his unmatched ability to achieve and attain all those things he set his eyes upon."
0

#3 User is offline   A is A 

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Regulars
  • Posts: 257
  • Joined: 14-July 04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Columbia, MD
  • Real Name:Paul

Posted 25 December 2009 - 04:39 AM

A lot more than licking can go on, and "eating out" does have its applications.
"It does not take a majority to prevail... but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." - Samuel Adams
0

#4 User is offline   Howard Roark 

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Regulars
  • Posts: 107
  • Joined: 26-May 09

Posted 25 December 2009 - 11:33 AM

You'll have to ask a cunnilinguist.
0

#5 User is offline   A is A 

  • Member
  • PipPipPip
  • Group: Regulars
  • Posts: 257
  • Joined: 14-July 04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Columbia, MD
  • Real Name:Paul

Posted 25 December 2009 - 12:22 PM

View PostHoward Roark, on Dec 25 2009, 12:33 PM, said:

You'll have to ask a cunnilinguist.

Do you mean a cunning linguist?
"It does not take a majority to prevail... but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brush fires of freedom in the minds of men." - Samuel Adams
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users