Who is Jamie Clay?
#21
Posted 03 March 2008 - 06:05 PM
Could you actually consider that there is a motive behind this that isn't irrational? I understand condemning a play at attention when it's clear that is what's happening, but I'm tired of Objectivists that are too quick to judge before any facts are in.
#22
Posted 04 March 2008 - 01:44 PM
Quote
I did consider it, for about a quarter of a second, but then decided that it's irrational to play immature games such as:
Quote
#23
Posted 04 March 2008 - 01:56 PM
KevinDW78, on Mar 4 2008, 11:44 AM, said:
my thoughts exactly.
on a side note:
i don't think we were being mean (aka "not being nice")
we all have vested interest in the production of this film, and our opinions of a particular person's ability to portray a character we all love and cherish has nothing to do with "niceness" or not. how many of us have poo-poo'ed on the angelina jolie choice? i don't see how this is any different.
i stand by my word; from what it looks like, i do not like the casting of this clay guy as galt. i would have prefered a young, strapping chap with piercing eyes ... like Henry Caville
vs. 
you tell me
#24
Posted 04 March 2008 - 03:00 PM
I did get an advance copy of the edited version of Galt's speech.
Though that may be another bad rumor. Seriously, I'd be interested to hear Mr. Clay's story, whichever one he is.
#25
Posted 04 March 2008 - 03:17 PM
Quote
ROFL
#26
Posted 05 March 2008 - 04:33 PM
Let me start with a simple background profile. I’m first generation born to objectivism. Was raised on the Brandon lectures, Fountain Head and of course Atlas Shrugged. Prof. Tibor Machan is a dear friend (who I grew up with calling Uncle) and Brandon was council to one of my brothers during less stable times. Note if you don’t know who Tibor is, it’s your loss but google him + Rand.
I’ve always been a Galt like character and when I had my special effects company, my crew would sometimes tease me in comparison. Sometime near the end of last year, one of them thought it would be a funny joke to put my name is for Galt on IMDB, and yes it’s very much like Wikipedia only with a larger delay before the change occurs. They also thought it was funny because I was a big Angelina Jolie fan (and that we both share a common birth DAY – not year, obviously).
Needless to say when they ‘pulled the prank’, we all had a good laugh and I didn’t think anything of leaving it there, fully expecting IMDB to eventually get the word that it was erroneous. They did and my name was removed.
Then it returned – and THEN I noticed these message boards where my name was coming up. (not much of a message board surfer, at least for this sort of topic)
Anyway - I theorized the studio may have liked that there was this buzz about this nobody guy playing ?Galt? – and maybe that’s why someone put my name back. I’ve made no attempt to resolve this because I’m confident it will resolve itself. If you’re offended by my lack of concern on this issue, I’m sorry, take a deep breath and enjoy knowing that your hero is still safe and no doubt will be played by some formula hunk that fits what you’ve imagined. (oh sure, as if)
At this point you would have to torture me to play Galt.
PS: part of me does like the foolish, erroneous and biting speculation that has come from this – it’s made the original prank all the more glorious. Thank you internets.
#27
Posted 05 March 2008 - 05:19 PM
Jamie Clay, on Mar 5 2008, 05:33 PM, said:
Should such things create a buzz these days? I mean, it would hardly be the first time an unkown actor is anounced as a star in a major motion picture. I refer you all to last year's Superman Returns, to name but one.
"I did not try. I succeeded." Sheldon Cooper
"I can't pretend a stranger is a long-awaited friend." RUSH
Sign at the Vorlon Tourist Office: "We have never been here."
#28
Posted 05 March 2008 - 05:59 PM
#29
Posted 05 March 2008 - 07:48 PM
#30
Posted 05 March 2008 - 07:54 PM
Jamie Clay, on Mar 5 2008, 04:33 PM, said:
Mary Sue.
"[T]rue innovators are never bound by what is: instead they dream of what could be" -- Gary Hamel.
"Society cannot contribute anything to the breeding and growing of ingenious men. A creative genius cannot be trained. There are no schools for creativeness. A genius is precisely a man who defies all schools and rules, who deviates from the traditional roads of routine and opens up new paths through land inaccessible before. A genius is always a teacher, never a pupil; he is always self-made. " -- Ludwig von Mises.
“Precisely because of their pretense, the conservatives are morally lower than the liberals; they are farther removed from reality – and, therefore, they are more harmful in practice. Since they purport to be fighting “big government,” they are the main source of political confusion in the public mind; they give people the illusion of an electoral alternative without the fact. Thus the statist drift proceeds unchecked and unchallenged.” – Leonard Peikoff
#31
Posted 05 March 2008 - 08:17 PM
Quote
It's not all your fault. To quote the tee shirt I am wearing right now, "I read The Fountainhead in 8th grade and that's why I'm an asshole!"
#32
Posted 06 March 2008 - 03:57 PM
Jamie Clay, on Mar 5 2008, 06:33 PM, said:
I bet the original prankster on your staff was Karl Raade. Wasn't it? In this picture on your DPH history page, he looks like he's dreaming up some Jamie Clay-related trick to play on the world. Also, I'm thinking Jonah Loop was in on it, too. Those guys seem like they are very close buddies. The way I figure it, it was most likely Karl who came up with the idea in the first place, but it was Jonah who actually made the changes in IMDB. Correct me if I'm wrong.
#33
Posted 06 March 2008 - 09:12 PM
IntolerantMan, on Mar 6 2008, 04:57 PM, said:
You actually spent time trying to figure this out?
"[T]rue innovators are never bound by what is: instead they dream of what could be" -- Gary Hamel.
"Society cannot contribute anything to the breeding and growing of ingenious men. A creative genius cannot be trained. There are no schools for creativeness. A genius is precisely a man who defies all schools and rules, who deviates from the traditional roads of routine and opens up new paths through land inaccessible before. A genius is always a teacher, never a pupil; he is always self-made. " -- Ludwig von Mises.
“Precisely because of their pretense, the conservatives are morally lower than the liberals; they are farther removed from reality – and, therefore, they are more harmful in practice. Since they purport to be fighting “big government,” they are the main source of political confusion in the public mind; they give people the illusion of an electoral alternative without the fact. Thus the statist drift proceeds unchecked and unchallenged.” – Leonard Peikoff
#34
Posted 07 March 2008 - 12:31 AM
DavidOdden, on Mar 4 2008, 04:00 PM, said:
This may be really off topic but I couldn't help but say it. That entire speech would be absolutly hilarious if it was narrated by Jeff Bridges as The Dude from the Big Lebowski and ended with "The Dude abides..."
#35
Posted 07 March 2008 - 04:11 AM
Miles White, on Mar 7 2008, 06:31 AM, said:
Actually it just reminds me of that Valley Girl thing from House:
http://uk.youtube.co...h?v=fGITZaosYtQ
The Head of Philosophy, on York University - queried on the coverage of Objectivism, said:
'Who am I, what do I want, and how am I going to get it?'
'One breath, one thought, one action' 'Deny nothing, invent nothing, speak up, stand up, stay out of school'

Help


















